UNBELIEVABLE SAD NEWS: Chicago Cubs Throwback Thursday – Remembering the College of Coaches
CHICAGO, IL — In an unforgettable chapter of Chicago Cubs history, a Throwback Thursday has Cubs fans across the country reflecting on one of the most bizarre and saddening experiments in Major League Baseball – the infamous “College of Coaches.” What was initially thought to be an innovative strategy aimed at breaking the Cubs’ long-standing World Series drought ended up becoming a cautionary tale in baseball management. Now, over 60 years later, the story remains a painful memory for Chicago’s loyal fanbase.
The College of Coaches: A Radical Experiment
It was the 1960s, and the Chicago Cubs, mired in mediocrity, were desperate for change. The team had not won a World Series since 1908, and frustration was building among fans and management alike. In response, Cubs owner Philip K. Wrigley introduced a radical idea in 1961 – the “College of Coaches.” Rather than having a traditional manager to lead the team, the Cubs would adopt a rotating system of coaches who would take turns overseeing the ballclub.
Wrigley’s vision was that the collective wisdom of multiple coaches, each with expertise in different areas, would create a well-rounded, versatile team. The idea was that no one coach would hold too much power or responsibility, and players would benefit from a broader range of instruction. It was a complete departure from the conventional model of leadership in baseball, and it drew widespread attention across the sport.
Wrigley himself famously declared, “Managers are expendable. I believe there should be relief managers just like relief pitchers. Managers are human too, and they can get tired just like pitchers.”
But what seemed like a bold move turned into one of the darkest periods in Cubs history.
Chaos and Confusion on the Field
From 1961 to 1965, the Cubs operated without a permanent manager, and the rotating coaching system wreaked havoc on the team. The roster of eight coaches, each assuming leadership at different times, caused significant confusion both on and off the field. The inconsistent leadership style left players frustrated and bewildered, as they were forced to adjust to different coaching philosophies, game strategies, and even interpersonal dynamics on an almost daily basis.
With no single figurehead to guide them, players lost confidence and direction. Star players struggled, and younger prospects found it hard to develop under the constantly shifting coaching regime. The clubhouse became divided, and the instability of the system started to take a toll on the team’s performance.
Throughout the College of Coaches experiment, the Cubs languished near the bottom of the National League standings. In 1962, the team lost 103 games, one of the worst seasons in Cubs history. The initiative that was meant to revolutionize the way baseball was managed had instead turned the team into a laughingstock.
The Fan Backlash
As the team’s performance declined, Cubs fans, who had already endured decades of disappointment, grew increasingly disillusioned with Wrigley’s unorthodox approach. Season after season, the experiment yielded no results, and fans began to lose hope. The College of Coaches, once seen as a daring and potentially game-changing move, had become a symbol of the Cubs’ never-ending struggle to escape their cursed history.
Old-timers still recall the frustration of watching their beloved Cubs flounder under the ill-fated system. “It was madness. You didn’t know who was in charge, and neither did the players,” recalls a longtime Cubs fan. “We had talent, but there was no direction. It was hard to watch.”
The End of the Experiment
By the mid-1960s, it became clear that the College of Coaches was not only ineffective but detrimental to the team’s success. In 1965, the Cubs finally abandoned the system and returned to the traditional model of having a single manager. Leo Durocher was brought in as manager, marking the official end of the College of Coaches era.
Under Durocher’s leadership, the Cubs began to show signs of improvement, culminating in a promising 1969 season where they contended for the National League pennant, although ultimately falling short. The damage of the College of Coaches experiment, however, left a deep scar in Cubs lore, and the team would not win a World Series for several more decades, until their triumphant victory in 2016.
Lessons Learned and the Legacy of the College of Coaches
Looking back, the College of Coaches serves as a lesson in the importance of stable leadership and clear direction in professional sports. The rotating coaching system, while innovative in concept, was an ill-fated experiment that highlighted the need for a strong, consistent managerial presence to guide players, especially during challenging times.
For many Cubs fans, the memory of the College of Coaches is a bittersweet reminder of a time when the team was trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of failed strategies and heartbreak. Though the Cubs have since gone on to find success and break their World Series curse in 2016, the legacy of the College of Coaches remains a testament to the team’s storied and often tumultuous past.
Conclusion: A Somber Throwback for Cubs Fans
On this Throwback Thursday, Cubs fans are reflecting on one of the saddest chapters in their team’s history. The College of Coaches experiment, once thought to be a revolutionary approach to baseball management, ended in disappointment and failure. Yet, as painful as those years were, they are also a crucial part of the Cubs’ journey—a reminder of the team’s resilience and the enduring hope that has sustained their fanbase for over a century.
As one fan aptly put it, “We went through it all. But that’s what being a Cubs fan is about. You endure the bad, you celebrate the good, and through it all, you never stop believing.”
Today, with the Cubs now seen as perennial contenders, the sad days of the College of Coaches feel like a distant memory—one that has helped shape the heart and soul of this proud Chicago franchise.
